The Ethics of Engineering

The Ethics of Engineering

• She posits that engineers should be more professionally oriented.
  • This implies that engineers in the AI era must respond to the exigencies of the workplace and societal demands for innovation and technological autonomy of the state.
  • This could give rise to a new archetype, homoinnovaticus, which is amusing, as if we don’t already possess a plethora of species.
    • What I believe she intended to convey was a person who thrives in the constantly evolving knowledge and innovation economy of the world, one that doesn’t rely solely on trading goods but operates through competence barter.
    • It evokes the zero marginal cost paradigm, where the cost of services trends towards zero, and we find ourselves compelled to participate in this exchange.
  • Homoinnovaticus is an individual who devises useful modern tools tailored to societal needs, though I missed some details from the speech; I need to consult her article.
    • This individual is capable of propelling society forward technically and enriching it spiritually in the process.
    • They seamlessly integrate multiple roles: engineer, scientist, designer, and creator, someone who not only articulates but also creates something that transforms the world.
      • As someone once remarked, “The engineer changes the world, while everyone else merely discusses it.”
      • The technology they develop addresses cultural dilemmas and influences the community.
    • An engineer is innovative and morally mature, accountable for the advancement of humanity.
  • The responsibility of imparting this ethical framework falls on the discipline of linguistics, though I cannot fully concur; philosophy plays a significantly larger role.
    • However, the language utilized by philosophers must be interpreted, which, frankly, is not what an engineer is tasked with.
    • They must process data and work with it, not interpret it; their mission is to alter the world.
  • MG also mentioned that modern products lack durability and gadgets require frequent updates because they are not designed to endure, and companies need new customers.
    • I contend she is mistaken here; we purchase new gadgets not because they frequently fail, but due to the advancements that engineers realize.
    • Phones are a prime example of this. Varied software necessitates more robust hardware, thus the need to acquire new gadgets.
    • Kitchenware is a separate issue; refrigerators, for instance, as well as stoves and ovens, can be operational for decades.
  • The new codex of invention rigorously adheres to ethics. The invention must be:
    • Cost-effective.
    • Durable.
      • Potentially robust and even antifragile.
    • Long-lasting.
    • Convenient.
• How to teach? MG argues that it should be through a case and problem-based approach in the classroom.
  • She even collaborated with Davidenko on a book that encompasses 25 units addressing a diverse range of topics.

---

BIO

theBrain mapping

Source:: Friend:: The evolution of a role of a teacher in education, The roles scientist can don to engage the public into discourse Child:: Next::

Keywords:

Related:

Reference: